January 30th, 2005


Previous Entry Next Entry
12:52 am - Ladies, is he really that hot?

(67 comments | Leave a comment)

 
Ladies, is he really that hot? - graffiti.maverick

• Recent Entries
• Friends
• Archive
> ChrisMaverick dot com
• profile


Art & Photography
> 365 Days of Mav
> Elseworld.com
> Mav's Flickr Stream
> MavTV (youtube)
> Party Nook

Wrestling
> International Males
> IWC Wrestling
> BDW Wrestling
> CWF Wrestling

Other
> 1KWFFH
> Mav's DVD Library
> Verdandi (currently down)
> Mav's Schedule (currently down)
> Mav's MySpace
chrismaverick. Get yours at flagrantdisregard.com/flickr

Comments:


[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: January 30th, 2005 - 09:59 am (Link)
wacky. Keep your girlfriend away from him. I'd hate to see you end up with syphillis.

See, that's the thing. I think Carmen Electra is sexy. I've seen pictures of her naked and I think "wow" I'd hit that. Or something along those lines. And yeah, the sex-kitten repuation probably helps that somewhat. But if you're asking me which of these pictures turns me on more:



 
Full BodyHead Shot


It's unquestionably the one on the left. Even though she appears to probably be more naked in the one on the right. The one on the right is a better photograph. She has better makeup. etc. I just don't think that a simple headshot is all that titilating. The full body shot isn't the sexiest thing ever either. But, it at least feels a little naughty, whereas the headshot feels like something she'd send in because she's trying to get an acting gig.
From: eyanyo Date: January 31st, 2005 - 09:52 am (Link)
well... i tried clicking on those pictures (assuming they're links to full-sized ones) but i got some kind of spanish not-authorised page on the full body one.

so i'll have to judge from the thumbnail versions. in this size, the one on the right is more attractive to me, because there's more detail. the full body one, i'm like, ok it's a girl and she's almost naked and she is nice and shapely, but i see zillions of pictures like this all over the place and it really isn't anything special. but in the closeup headshot one, you can really tell how attractive this is. not that this has anything to do with your original point, because i'm not getting totally incited to commit sexually-related acts simply by looking at *either* of these pictures...
[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: January 31st, 2005 - 10:05 am (Link)
well... i tried clicking on those pictures (assuming they're links to full-sized ones) but i got some kind of spanish not-authorised page on the full body one.

The site is just being funny about letting you click a direct link. Try clicking on it, and then clicking return in the url banner, or cutting and pasting the url directly in: http://bradvei2.webcindario.com/carmen-electra/bradvei-carmen-electra-DTfeb4-04.jpg

so i'll have to judge from the thumbnail versions. in this size, the one on the right is more attractive to me, because there's more detail. the full body one, i'm like, ok it's a girl and she's almost naked and she is nice and shapely, but i see zillions of pictures like this all over the place and it really isn't anything special. but in the closeup headshot one, you can really tell how attractive this is. not that this has anything to do with your original point, because i'm not getting totally incited to commit sexually-related acts simply by looking at *either* of these pictures...

Actually, that sort of was my original point. I have a hard time believing that the covers of Cosmo, Maxim, US Weekly or even Playboy are enticing kids to run out and have sex immediately. Much less a simple head shot of Colin Farell, man-whore that he is.
 

• Go to Top
LiveJournal.com