September 28th, 2005

Previous Entry Next Entry
08:48 am - and this is what all the trouble is for?

(22 comments | Leave a comment)

and this is what all the trouble is for? - graffiti.maverick — LiveJournal

• Recent Entries
• Friends
• Archive
> ChrisMaverick dot com
• profile

Art & Photography
> 365 Days of Mav
> Mav's Flickr Stream
> MavTV (youtube)
> Party Nook

> International Males
> IWC Wrestling
> BDW Wrestling
> CWF Wrestling

> Mav's DVD Library
> Verdandi (currently down)
> Mav's Schedule (currently down)
> Mav's MySpace
chrismaverick. Get yours at


[User Picture]From: danitapgh Date: September 28th, 2005 - 10:58 pm (Link)
Two words:
Clarence Thomas

I don't get why this is a supreme court issue. She was the wife at the time? I thought that women in this country had certain rights. If she didn't sign some sort of prenup, shouldn't ALL the money be hers?
[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: September 29th, 2005 - 02:58 am (Link)
not necessarilly. It depends on the state. As I understand it, in California, as the wife she is automatically entitled to half, no matter what the will says. In Texas, the will is the law. The courts I guess ruled they were Texas residents. Or something like that. The case is 10 years old, and I'm doing this from memory.

• Go to Top