December 7th, 2005

Previous Entry Next Entry
01:25 am - on t-shirts and tits (ok, this one was easy)...

(63 comments | Leave a comment)

on t-shirts and tits (ok, this one was easy)... - graffiti.maverick — LiveJournal

• Recent Entries
• Friends
• Archive
> ChrisMaverick dot com
• profile

Art & Photography
> 365 Days of Mav
> Mav's Flickr Stream
> MavTV (youtube)
> Party Nook

> International Males
> IWC Wrestling
> BDW Wrestling
> CWF Wrestling

> Mav's DVD Library
> Verdandi (currently down)
> Mav's Schedule (currently down)
> Mav's MySpace
chrismaverick. Get yours at


[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: December 7th, 2005 - 08:40 pm (Link)
but don't you see that you aren't really disagreing with me? You're disagreeing with them. I never said that a woman was defined strictly by her sexuality. I never even said it was the most important thing. In fact, if one follows my dating history over the past couple decades or so, one will discover that really, I don't much care for "stupid" girls. I also don't much care for "ugly" girls. Call me too picky if you want, but I tend to like cute smart girls. That's just me. To each their own.

See, what I think you are really complaining about is that the T-shirt kind of objectifies the wearer into a certain one-dimensional chariacture. I agree. People are not one-dimensional. But it's not the person. It's a joke on a T-shirt. My specific statement is that "who ever said brains are more important than beauty?" (or specifically boobs). Let's say that a girl has a Playboy style body, but a below average IQ. Maybe just because that's how she was raised, maybe she has a learning disability. Do you honestly think its wrong of her to make money by posing nude? I think that's incredibly prejudicial. Not everyone is genetically gifted in the brains department either. I think its wrong to assume that those who aren't but are gifted in the physical department are somehow "bad." Just as wrong as it is to make that assumption the other way.

And that's what these girls are recommending. The problem is its not as obvious because their T-shirts aren't very funny. If it were me, I'd have designed a T-shirt that said "I may be flat chested, but my company IPO'd at 157/share." Or "maybe I'm ugly, but I'm smart and rich." Or even simply "who needs boobs when you have brains like these?" All of those shirts are much funnier than the ones the girls came up with because they make fun of the one-dimensional mockery. The very stereotypes that cause prejudices and discrimination are what make the shirt funny.

Often people like to claim that "of course the brain is all that matters." "Looks are unimportant." But that's simply not true. And not even just in the "big boobed girls get better breaks" way. Looks matter. If they didn't then no one would bathe. Or comb their hair. My company would allow me to wear jeans and T-shirts to work. And if looks didn't matter, then these girls would never have complained about the A&F shirts in the first place. Because, really who cares what other people wear?

My point is, you're misinterpretting. I'm not at all talking about my right to look at a woman's chest. Besides, I'm totally an assman. What I'm talking about is the right of a girl to be what she wants to be. And if she wants celebrate her breasts then she should be able to. Is being a stripper a celebration of femaledom? No, its a job. But being a lawyer isn't a celebration of femaledom either. And to me its wrong to judge either of them without knowing the specifics of the personality and situation of the person. But you know what? I'll still make a joke about either one. But in reality, I absolutely refuse to judge either one. And I think that's what the girls are doing. They are making a value judgement that says "being smart is good, being pretty is a non-issue." That's not true. And its not fair.

• Go to Top