February 16th, 2006

Previous Entry Next Entry
05:22 pm - on sex on the first date...

(14 comments | Leave a comment)

on sex on the first date... - graffiti.maverick — LiveJournal

• Recent Entries
• Friends
• Archive
> ChrisMaverick dot com
• profile

Art & Photography
> 365 Days of Mav
> Elseworld.com
> Mav's Flickr Stream
> MavTV (youtube)
> Party Nook

> International Males
> IWC Wrestling
> BDW Wrestling
> CWF Wrestling

> Mav's DVD Library
> Verdandi (currently down)
> Mav's Schedule (currently down)
> Mav's MySpace
chrismaverick. Get yours at flagrantdisregard.com/flickr


[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: February 17th, 2006 - 12:05 am (Link)
1) fixed... thanx... damn typos that are another word.

2) only for convenience sake. I was trying to limit the waiting til you're married thing to the 3rd bullet.

So yeah, I don't necessarilly disagree with you. And I didn't mean to suggest that sex on the first date was mandatory, more that I think that having a "rule" against it is kinda silly. I will grant the practicality of your trust issue. But I still think that the classic sitcoms rationals (which some people seem to still adhere to) for why are kinda silly and outdated.

Ignoring the trust issue, do you honestly respect someone less for first date sex?
[User Picture]From: qiika Date: February 17th, 2006 - 12:52 am (Link)
Unless a not-date was to the clinic together, yes, I honestly respect someone less if they want to have sex on the first date. It's a respect issue - respect for themselves and their respect for their potential partner(s) are questioned if things like protection from and prevention of STD are not taken into consideration.

And I should count as a guy when it comes to my views about sex.
[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: February 17th, 2006 - 01:06 am (Link)
nah, you don't count as a guy. Just a person. Sorry...

hmm... that's a fair view. I don't know that I agree with it. I don't think that there's a common mental connection between safe sex protection and actual accompaniment to the clinic. Like Mike, I guess you're assuming that a first date means you don't know the person ahead of time. That has very VERY infrequently been the case for me.

But the real thing here is, and this has to do with why you don't count as a "guy" given your answer, the insinuation from the "mom-esque" quotes, and what I was getting at in the post, is that the boy will want to have sex with the girl, and will totally do so if given the opportunity. But then won't respect the girl after, because secretly we boys want innocent virginal girls.
[User Picture]From: qiika Date: February 17th, 2006 - 01:12 am (Link)
Okay, you've got me there. I know of no one in our age bracket who has actually said that they want to marry a virgin.
[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: February 17th, 2006 - 01:17 am (Link)
ah... I actually know some... and similarly those who wanted to remain as such until married...

and certainly several who were waiting until they found the person they intended to marry.
[User Picture]From: qiika Date: February 17th, 2006 - 12:15 pm (Link)
You must interact with a better cross-section, then.
[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: February 17th, 2006 - 12:40 pm (Link)
depends on what your definition of "better." broader certainly...

• Go to Top