April 27th, 2006

Previous Entry Next Entry
02:13 am - 1KWFFH: on hometown hotties on the cyberbathroom wall...

(71 comments | Leave a comment)

1KWFFH: on hometown hotties on the cyberbathroom wall... - graffiti.maverick — LiveJournal

• Recent Entries
• Friends
• Archive
> ChrisMaverick dot com
• profile

Art & Photography
> 365 Days of Mav
> Elseworld.com
> Mav's Flickr Stream
> MavTV (youtube)
> Party Nook

> International Males
> IWC Wrestling
> BDW Wrestling
> CWF Wrestling

> Mav's DVD Library
> Verdandi (currently down)
> Mav's Schedule (currently down)
> Mav's MySpace
chrismaverick. Get yours at flagrantdisregard.com/flickr


[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: April 28th, 2006 - 01:28 am (Link)
well, the obvious belief is that they kids are guilty of sexual harassment, but I honestly think the case there is really weak. Simply put, the kids are guilty of being annoying teenagers. That's just not a crime, no matter how badly anyone's feelings are hurt.

As stated in comments above, they could alternatively be guilty of libel, but that's only the case if you can prove they knowingly lied about something. "Katherine has nice boobs" is not libel, nor is "Katherine is a slut" because those would just be opinions. "Katherine gave a blowjob to Johnny Depp" could be libelous, but only if you can prove that A) you didn't blow Depp and B) I know that you didn't blow Depp but said it specifically to defame your character. That's important. Libel involves the allegations being false and the writer being malicious, which specifically means that the writer either knows the allegation is false or has reckless disregard to the truth. Thus, I don't really need to witness you blowing Depp. If he tells me that you blew him and I have no reason to disbelieve him, then when I print it I'm not guiltly of libel (he may be guilty of slander, if you didn't actually blow him). Furthermore, if I have every reason to believe that you blew Depp, like maybe you had a date with him and then later someone saw him getting a blowjob in the parking lot, and no one really saw your face, but everyone assumed it was you and therefore it was common belief that you blew Depp, even though in reality it was Steph who just hooked up with him after your date, then again, I am still not being libelous by reporting on it. And finally, if you're known to have blown Grieco, Peter DeLuise, Dustin Nguyen, Steven Williams and went down on Holly Robinson, then it probably doesn't really "defame your character" to say that you blew Depp too. It's all very complex. But at the end of the day, I don't think you can prove that these boys were attempting to defame the character of the girls. In fact, I'd say their point was more a misguided attempt to score with them (or help their friends do so), so its definitely a weak case at best.

Now, I haven't read the list because I couldn't find it, but its entirely possible we could charge them with bad grammar.
[User Picture]From: marmal8 Date: April 28th, 2006 - 01:52 am (Link)
Next time you talk to Johnny Depp, let him know I'd be happy to blow him.
[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: April 28th, 2006 - 02:13 am (Link)
Katherine is such a slut. :-)
[User Picture]From: marmal8 Date: April 28th, 2006 - 07:53 pm (Link)
Only for Johnny, Hugh, Jude, and Orlando.
[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: April 28th, 2006 - 08:10 pm (Link)
I heard you went down on Peter Deluise.... on a good note, though, he gave you an A-

[User Picture]From: marmal8 Date: April 28th, 2006 - 08:42 pm (Link)
[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: April 28th, 2006 - 09:44 pm (Link)
No it's not... it's only libel if you can find some way to proove to me that you can do better (or worse) than an A-.... Hmmm... what comes to mind...

• Go to Top