October 12th, 2006


Previous Entry Next Entry
10:16 pm - on juggs, journals and jams...

(43 comments | Leave a comment)

 
on juggs, journals and jams... - graffiti.maverick

• Recent Entries
• Friends
• Archive
> ChrisMaverick dot com
• profile


Art & Photography
> 365 Days of Mav
> Elseworld.com
> Mav's Flickr Stream
> MavTV (youtube)
> Party Nook

Wrestling
> International Males
> IWC Wrestling
> BDW Wrestling
> CWF Wrestling

Other
> 1KWFFH
> Mav's DVD Library
> Verdandi (currently down)
> Mav's Schedule (currently down)
> Mav's MySpace
chrismaverick. Get yours at flagrantdisregard.com/flickr

Comments:


[User Picture]From: chrismaverick Date: October 31st, 2006 - 03:24 pm (Link)
no its not. The law and society shouldn't conform to the desires of the individual simply the rights of the individual. Take my abortion issue. I am pro-choice. I think there are a lot of good reasons to have an abortion. But I can't say "you can only have an abortion if Mav thinks its a good idea." Maybe a woman wants an abortion because she doesn't want children. Maybe she wants one because she doesn't want stretch marks. Who are we to judge?

Similarly, if it were left ip to me, women would be forced to wear their hair long. There's noting wrong with short hair mind you. I just like long hair better. At least usually. There are some people who look good with short hair. But I can't say "you can only have a haircut if Mav thinks its a good idea." Maybe a woman wants short hair because she looks pretty with it. Maybe she is just too lazy to care for long hair. Who are we to judge?

I'd say breast augementation lies somewhere along the body modification continuum between haircuts and abortion. Therefore, I'd argue that the rules that apply to both of them should apply to boob jobs as well.

And umm... wow... you're digging into the blogosphere past today, aren't you? what made you come back to this?
 

• Go to Top
LiveJournal.com